Communication in dentistry: the 6 Cs of high-impact communication and the communication matrix
Authors
Alessandro Quaranta, Orlando D'Isidoro, Nishith Bhargava, Wang Lai Hui
Abstract
Aim: In healthcare settings, communication extends beyond the mere transmission of information and significantly influences patient trust, emotional dynamics, behavioral adherence, leadership perceptions, and organizational culture. Accordingly, this paper introduces the 6 Cs of High-Impact Communication as a conceptual framework designed to enhance communication proficiency in contemporary dental settings, alongside the QCM Matrix.
Methods: This paper provides a narrative and conceptual analysis informed by clinical experience, behavioral communication principles, leadership theory, and existing literature on healthcare communication, patient-centered care, and organizational communication in dentistry.
Although communication is frequently discussed in dentistry, it remains commonly underestimated in daily clinical practice. While clinicians receive extensive training in diagnosis, treatment planning, and procedural skills, comparatively less emphasis is placed on developing effective communication with patients, colleagues, and team members.
In reality, many challenges faced in contemporary dental practice are not purely technical. Anxiety, poor compliance, misunderstandings, reduced treatment acceptance, complaints, and even team dysfunction frequently contain a substantial communication component.
This paper examines communication within the modern dental team from a practical and patient-centered perspective. It focuses on non-verbal communication, patient interviews, behavioral factors that affect treatment acceptance, leadership communication, and team alignment. Additionally, it presents practical frameworks relevant to both specialist and general dental practices, including the QCM Matrix (Quaranta Communication Matrix) and the 6 Cs of High-Impact Communication framework.
Results: Multiple practical strategies may improve communication in daily practice: during patient encounters, team communication, and difficult conversations. The paper clearly shows the factors involved.
Conclusions: Communication should not be regarded solely as a “soft skill”. In numerous clinical situations, it serves as a diagnostic tool, a behavioral management strategy, and a critical component of long-term patient care.
PDF
